Truth, rules, hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox

Philosophical Review 99 (3):323-53 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

reprint Millikan, Ruth Garrett (2002) "Truth Rules, Hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein Paradox". In Miller, Alexander, Wright, Crispin, Rule-Following and Meaning, pp. 209-233: Mcgill-Queen's University Press (2002)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scepticism, Rules and Language.Gordon P. Baker & Peter Michael Stephan Hacker - 1984 - [New York]: Blackwell. Edited by P. M. S. Hacker.
Philosophical investigations 201: A Wittgensteinian reply to Kripke.Donna M. Summerfield - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (3):417-438.
The community view.John V. Canfield - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):469-488.
Kripke on Wittgenstein on rules.Warren D. Goldfarb - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (September):471-488.
On the paradox Kripke finds in Wittgenstein.Arthur W. Collins - 1992 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):74-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
415 (#69,019)

6 months
19 (#152,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Millikan
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Representation in Cognitive Science.Nicholas Shea - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Misrepresenting and malfunctioning.Karen Neander - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (2):109-41.
(Nonsolipsistic) conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1987 - In Ernest LePore (ed.), New directions in semantics. Orlando: Academic Press. pp. 55–81.
Semantic normativity.Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (2):203-26.

View all 69 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references