The Fragile Nature of the Social Mind: a commentary on Alva Noë.

In Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Windt (eds.), Open MIND. MIND group. pp. 0-0 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that while Noë’s actionist approach offers an excellent elaboration of classical approaches to conceptual understanding, it risks underestimating the role of social interactions and relations. Noë’s approach entails a form of body-based individualism according to which understanding is something the mind does all by itself. I propose that we adopt a stronger perspective on the role of sociality and consider the human mind in terms of socially enacted autonomy. On this view, the mind depends constitutively on engaging with and relating to others. As a consequence, conceptual understanding must be seen as a co-achievement. It is a fragile endeavour precisely because it depends not only on the individual but also on the continuous contribution of other subjects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-08

Downloads
30 (#754,850)

6 months
30 (#117,863)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miriam Kyselo
Technische Universität Berlin