Abstract

A priori concepts, according to Kant, are used just for the objective or the experienced phenomenon, and applying them for the others the “transcendental objects”) are not valid. Unlike Kant, in Newtonian physics, they can be used both for experienced and non- experienced phenomenon. Comparing with what was developed by Nicolas Copernicus in Cosmology in the 16th century, Kant calls his viewpoint as a “Copernican Revolution” that happened in the philosophy. In the framework of Critical philosophy, Kant tries to explain and defend from his epistemological revolution. Here, firstly, I will argue that, Kant's premises of judgment do not entail the transcendental Idealism, and secondly, Kant's Copernican revolution is not a perspective in the frame of critical philosophy but it is a kind of transcendental metaphysics.