Against Draconian Penalties for Covid-19 Quarantine Infringements

Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2:17-28 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 2020, after the first Covid-19 lockdown, several countries implemented a policy of contact tracing and self-isolating for individuals who crossed borders or came into contact with infected people. To enforce these restrictions, some states imposed very harsh monetary penalties for people who violated them. Behind these harsh fines lies an instrumental rationale. They allow the state to avoid implementing a system of labor-intensive and costly surveillance and enforcement. In this article I argue that such severe penalties are extremely unjust. In order not to expose citizens to the risk of being excessively fined, governmental institutions should instead intensify controls. I argue that they owe it to their citizens to increase the surveillance of compliance with self-isolation obligations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-20

Downloads
32 (#696,492)

6 months
2 (#1,685,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elias Moser
Karl Franzens University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations