Negative actions

Philosophia 37 (2):307-333 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers have argued that refraining from performing an action consists in actively keeping oneself from performing that action or preventing one’s performing it. Since activities must be held to be positive actions, this implies that negative actions are a species of positive actions which is to say that all actions are positive actions. I defend the following claims: (i)  Positive actions necessarily include activity or effort, negative actions may require activity or effort, but never include the activity or effort which may be required. (ii)  Unless it is, or was, at some time in P’s power to Q, P does not refrain from Q-ing. (iii)  Negative actions are actions , they are causings of negative facts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
110 (#193,660)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Events.Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Not Doings as Resistance.Kaisa Kärki - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (4):364-384.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits.Bertrand Russell - 1948 - London and New York: Routledge.
Motivation and agency.Alfred R. Mele - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Events and Their Names.Jonathan Bennett - 1988 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 28 references / Add more references