“The awe in which biologists hold physicists”: Frits Went’s first phytotron at Caltech, and an experimental definition of the biological environment

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (2):209-231 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After Darwin, experimental biology sought to unravel organisms. By the early twentieth century, organisms were broadly conceived as the product of their heredity and their environment. Much historical work has explored the scientific attack on the genotype, particularly through the new science of genetics. This article explores the tandem efforts to assert experimental control over the environment in which plants grew and developed. The case described here concerns the creation of the first phytotron at Caltech by botanist and plant physiologist Frits Went. Opening in 1949, the phytotron was a plant laboratory that, across a series of rooms and chambers, kept genes constant while regulating and maintaining defined ranges of known environments. This article details the context in which the phytotron emerged, how the phytotron gained its sobriquet, and how it served to cement the “environment” as a category of biological knowledge. Describing the institutional context of Caltech, its interdisciplinary culture, and its encouragement of adopting technology into biological science, I argue that the phytotron and the commensurate category of the “environment” were the product of the familiar movement to integrate the physical and biological sciences. In addition, however, the creation of the phytotron was also a broader story of plant physiologists establishing a definition of the “environment” in both physical and technological terms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Marine Biology?: Defining a Science in the United States in the Mid 20 th Century.Erik Ellis - 2007 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (4):469 - 493.
The varied lives of organisms: variation in the historiography of the biological sciences.Gerald L. Geison & Manfred D. Laubichler - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (1):1-29.
The varied lives of organisms: Variation in the historiography of the biological sciences.L. G. & D. M. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (1):1-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-05

Downloads
15 (#1,229,929)

6 months
7 (#699,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Dialectical Biologist.Philip Kitcher, Richard Levins & Richard Lewontin - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (2):262.
The J. H. B. Bookshelf.Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis - 1998 - Journal of the History of Biology 31 (2):289-302.
Naturalist.Edward O. Wilson - 1996 - Journal of the History of Biology 29 (1):145-147.

View all 22 references / Add more references