Function, modality, mental content

Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):84-87 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I clarify some of the details of the modal theory of function I outlined in Nanay (2010): (a) I explicate what it means that the function of a token biological trait is fixed by modal facts; (b) I address an objection to my trait type individuation argument against etiological function and (c) I examine the consequences of replacing the etiological theory of function with a modal theory for the prospects of using the concept of biological function to explain mental content.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-02

Downloads
437 (#65,963)

6 months
86 (#72,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp

Citations of this work

Teleosemantics without etiology.Bence Nanay - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):798-810.
The Modal Theory of Function Is Not about Functions.Marc Artiga - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (4):580-591.
Artifact Categorization and the Modal Theory of Artifact Function.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):515-526.
Contextualism about object-seeing.Ben Phillips - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2377-2396.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Function and Modality.Osamu Kiritani - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (1):1-4.

Add more references