The Phase Rule and the Notion of Substance

In Henk W. De Regt, Stephan Hartmann & Samir Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 253--262 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to difficulties in understanding the notion of chemical substance at issue in Gibbs’ phase rule, there is a long tradition of reformulating the simple statement of the rule. The leading idea is to rewrite the rule with a term for the number of substances actually present and to introduce additional terms making explicit the various kinds of restrictions which in the original formulation are taken to be incorporated into Gibbs’ notion of the number of independent substances. Although the number of independent substances cannot in general be interpreted as the number of substances actually present, it is not an entirely derivative concept as the authors of the reformulations sometimes seem to presuppose. In particular, it is doubtful whether the number of substances actually present is a clearly delimited concept which can be determined prior to the application of the phase rule. In that case, the phase rule provides a useful source of information for the determination of the number and nature of the substances actually present in a mixture which should be properly reflected in an adequate interpretation of Gibbs’ notion of independent substances. For this purpose, I propose a mereological interpretation of the way independent substances are related to the substances actually present which makes sense of the fact that the former are not uniquely fixed but can be chosen from the latter in several ways

Other Versions

original Needham, Paul (2011) "The phase rule and the notion of substance". In De Regt, Henk W., Hartmann, Stephan, Okasha, Samir, EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009, pp. 253-62: Springer (2011)

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The phase rule and the notion of substance.Paul Needham - 2011 - In Henk W. De Regt, Stephan Hartmann & Samir Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 253-62.
A Mereological Interpretation of the Phase Rule.Paul Needham - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):900-910.
Compounds and Mixtures.Paul Needham - 2012 - In Robin Hendry, Andrea Woody & Paul Needham (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol 6: Philosophy of Chemistry. pp. 271-290.
Substance and Time.Paul Needham - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (3):485-512.
Aristotle on Ontological Dependence.Phil Corkum - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (1):65 - 92.
Macroscopic Mixtures.Paul Needham - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (1):26-52.
Substance.Howard Robinson & Ralph Weir - 2024 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances.Adam Harmer - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):236-259.
Substance and Modality.Paul Needham - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):829-840.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
14 (#1,294,570)

6 months
3 (#1,499,259)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Needham
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1871 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
Epistemology and cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.

View all 265 references / Add more references