Utilitarian Eschatology

American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (4):339-47 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional utilitarianism, when applied, implies a surprising prediction about the future, viz., that all experience of pleasure and pain must end once and for all, or infinitely dwindle. Not only is this implication surprising, it should render utilitarianism unacceptable to persons who hold any of the following theses: that evaluative propositions may not imply descriptive, factual propositions; that evaluative propositions may not imply contingent factual propositions about the future; that there will always exist beings who experience pleasure or pain.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Utilitarianism and infinite utility.Peter Vallentyne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
Infinite utility: Anonymity and person-centredness.Peter Vallentyne - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):413 – 420.
Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham.Michael J. Cholbi - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Barriers to implication.Greg Restall - 2010 - In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume and ‘is’ and ‘ought’: new essays. Palgrave-Macmillan.
A Defense of Scalar Utilitarianism.Kevin Patrick Tobia - 2017 - American Philosophical Quarterly 54 (3):283-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-17

Downloads
96 (#219,962)

6 months
5 (#1,047,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark T. Nelson
Westmont College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references