The Concepts of Responsibility and Vocation in the Theological Ethics of Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Dissertation, The University of Chicago (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many scholars hold the concept of responsibility as an entry point into the thought of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Yet these same scholars often differ in their understandings of responsibility, which leads to lack of consensus, diffuse popularity, and confounding conclusions regarding Bonhoeffer's ethics. Bonhoeffer contributes to this confusion with his varying references to responsibility in The Cost of Discipleship and in Ethics. While in each text responsibility is linked with the concept of vocation, references to the two concepts differ. Broadly speaking, in The Cost of Discipleship, Bonhoeffer employs "call" and "response" to emphasize dialogical relationship between the responsive human being and the dynamic divine. The responsible act is carried out by an obedient disciple who is called by Christ to act as a sign directed toward eternal salvation. In Ethics, references to "calling," "mandates," and "responsibility" emphasize the importance of the penultimate consequences of human actions and of broad divine communication to God's creatures. The responsible act is executed by a faithful person fulfilling responsibilities within Christ-mandated callings and aiming at consequential temporal well-being of others. Jesus Christ is the revelational site in both texts. However, while in The Cost of Discipleship, the church is the single locus of Christ, in Ethics, mandates of family, job, government, culture as well as church are created by Christ and manifest God's will. This dissertation then advances several claims. First, only a close study of responsibility provides adequate access to Bonhoeffer's ethics. Second, a better understanding of his use of responsibility and his ethics is gained through a study of the variety of linkages and connotations of the concepts of responsibility and vocation as found in The Cost of Discipleship and Ethics. Third, both concepts prove to be foundational to contemporary Christian ethics. Together, these complementary concepts offer balance and insight with regard to theological issues including law and gospel, stasis and change, and structure and freedom

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,891

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics.Dietrich Bonhoeffer - 1995 - New York: Simon & Schuster. Edited by Eberhard Bethge.
For a better worldliness: Abraham Kuyper, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and discipleship for the common good.Brant M. Himes - 2018 - Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers. Edited by Richard J. Mouw.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references