- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (2):510 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reconciling schizophrenic deficits in top-down and bottom-up processes: Not yet.Angus W. MacDonald - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):96-96.
Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies.David Foulkes & G. William Domhoff - 2014 - Consciousness and Cognition 27:168-171.
What is Bottom-Up and What is Top-Down in Predictive Coding?Karsten Rauss & Gilles Pourtois - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
Distinguishing Top-Down From Bottom-Up Effects.Nicholas Shea - 2014 - In Dustin Stokes, Mohan Matthen & Stephen Biggs (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 73-91.
Top-down and bottom-up influences on observation: Evidence from cognitive psychology and the history of science. In A. Raftopoulos (Ed.), Cognitive penetrability of perception: Attention, action, strategies, and bottom-up constraints.(pp. 31-47).William F. Brewer & Lester Loschky (eds.) - 2004 - Nova Science Publishers.
Representations need self-organizing top-down expectations to fit a changing world.Stephen Grossberg - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):473-474.
Analysis of Functions and Dysfunctions of Direct Democracy: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives.Yannis Papadopoulos - 1995 - Politics and Society 23 (4):421-448.
The meta-learning toolkit needs stronger constraints.Erin Grant - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e152.
Identifying the neural systems of top–down attentional control: a meta-analytic approach.Barry Giesbrecht & George R. Mangun - 2005 - In Laurent Itti, Geraint Rees & John K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of Attention. Academic Press. pp. 63--68.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-12
Downloads
47 (#460,316)
6 months
9 (#449,254)
2013-12-12
Downloads
47 (#460,316)
6 months
9 (#449,254)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The effect of phasic auditory alerting on visual perception.Anders Petersen, Annemarie Hilkjær Petersen, Claus Bundesen, Signe Vangkilde & Thomas Habekost - 2017 - Cognition 165 (C):73-81.
Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention.Christian H. Poth, Anders Petersen, Claus Bundesen & Werner X. Schneider - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5:98474.
Human Symmetry Uncertainty Detected by a Self-Organizing Neural Network Map.Birgitta Dresp-Langley - 2021 - Symmetry 13:299.
No arousal-biased competition in focused visuospatial attention.Árni Gunnar Ásgeirsson & Sander Nieuwenhuis - 2017 - Cognition 168 (C):191-204.
References found in this work
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.R. Desimone & J. Duncan - 1995 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1):193-222.
Visual search and stimulus similar¬ity.John Duncan & Glyn W. Humphreys - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (3):433-458.
Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.Gordon D. Logan & Robert D. Gordon - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (2):393-434.
A Neural Theory of Visual Attention: Bridging Cognition and Neurophysiology.Claus Bundesen, Thomas Habekost & Søren Kyllingsbæk - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):291-328.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2