From the universe to subsystems: Why quantum mechanics appears more stochastic than classical mechanics

Fluctuation and Noise Letters 15 (3) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By means of the examples of classical and Bohmian quantum mechanics, we illustrate the well-known ideas of Boltzmann as to how one gets from laws defined for the universe as a whole to dynamical relations describing the evolution of subsystems. We explain how probabilities enter into this process, what quantum and classical probabilities have in common and where exactly their difference lies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-05

Downloads
73 (#287,707)

6 months
12 (#298,890)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrea Oldofredi
University of Lisbon
Michael Esfeld
University of Lausanne
Dustin Lazarovici
Technion, Israel Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Interacting Minds in the Physical World.Alin C. Cucu - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Lausanne
Typicality and Minutis Rectis Laws: From Physics to Sociology.Gerhard Wagner - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (3):447-458.
On the possibility of a realist ontological commitment in quantum mechanics.Andrea Oldofredi & Michael Andreas Esfeld - 2018 - Tropos. Journal of Hermeneutics and Philosophical Criticism 11 (1):11-33.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Time and Chance.S. French - 2005 - Mind 114 (453):113-116.
Three measurement problems.Tim Maudlin - 1995 - Topoi 14 (1):7-15.
Quantum physics without quantum philosophy.Detlef Dürr, Sheldon Goldstein & Nino Zanghì - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (2):137-149.
What could be objective about probabilities?Tim Maudlin - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):275-291.

View all 15 references / Add more references