Revisiting Dummett's Proof-Theoretic Justification Procedures

In Arazim Pavel & Lávička Tomáš (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2016. College Publications. pp. 141-155 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dummett’s justification procedures are revisited. They are used as background for the discussion of some conceptual and technical issues in proof-theoretic semantics, especially the role played by assumptions in proof-theoretic definitions of validity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-20

Downloads
475 (#57,888)

6 months
77 (#76,514)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hermógenes Oliveira
Federal University of Paraiba

Citations of this work

Proof-Theoretic Validity isn’t Intuitionistic; So What?Will Stafford - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logical basis of metaphysics.Michael Dummett - 1991 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael Dummett, Hilary Putnam & James Conant - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):519-527.
The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic.Michael Dummett - 1975 - In Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 215--247.
Ideas and Results in Proof Theory.Dag Prawitz & J. E. Fenstad - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):232-234.

View all 10 references / Add more references