The doomsday argument and the number of possible observers

Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):164-184 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If the human race comes to an end relatively shortly, then we have been born at a fairly typical time in the history of humanity; if trillions of people eventually exist, then we have been born in the first surprisingly tiny fraction of all people. According to the 'doomsday argument' of Carter, Leslie, Gott and Nielsen, this means that the chance of a disaster which would obliterate humanity is much larger than usually thought. But treating possible observers in the same way as those who actually exist avoids this conclusion: our existence is more likely in a race which is long-lived, and this cancels out the doomsday argument, so that the chance of a disaster is only what one would ordinarily estimate

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
143 (#157,239)

6 months
8 (#588,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Doomsday--or: The dangers of statistics.Dennis Dieks - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (166):78-84.
The End of the World.John Leslie - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):155-158.
The Anthropic Principle and its Implications for Biological Evolution [and Discussion].Brandon Carter & William H. McCrea - 1983 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 310 (1512):347-363.

View all 7 references / Add more references