Anselm and the ontological argument

In Jeff Jordan (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: The Key Thinkers. Continuum. pp. 22-43 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter gives an exposition and critique of Anselm's Proslogion II argument.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm and the ontological argument.Brian Davies - 2004 - In Brian Leftow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 157--178.
Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas Williams.
Godelian ontological arguments.G. Oppy - 1996 - Analysis 56 (4):226-230.
Anselm's God in Isabelle/HOL.Ben Blumson - 2017 - Archive of Formal Proofs:9.
Anselm and Russell.Maciej Nowicki - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):355-368.
The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2007 - In Paul Copan & Chad Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-02

Downloads
2,214 (#5,342)

6 months
443 (#3,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anselm and actuality.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Noûs 4 (2):175-188.
The ontological argument.Brian Leftow - 2005 - In William J. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
St. Anselm’s Argument.M. J. Charlesworth - 2019 - In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 105-114.

View all 7 references / Add more references