Teleology of Nature in Aristotle

The Monist 52 (2):159-173 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I. An approach to the question of teleology in nature for Aristotle requires first of all a sufficiently clear understanding of the terms involved. In regard to the notion of teleology itself, there can hardly be any pertinent difficulty. The term is a modern one, and is quite definitely fixed in meaning by contemporary use. It seems to have been coined in eighteenth-century philosophical Latin to denote the study of final causes in nature. It became readily accepted in modern philosophical vocabulary. Against this historical background it is commonly understood today to focus on “purposive or goal-directed activity.” In application to nature it assumes that purposive activity is present and asks how the activity is to be identified and described. The initial problem, accordingly, will lie not with the notion of teleology but rather with the other term, ‘nature’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
98 (#215,975)

6 months
23 (#133,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Aristotle on Natural Slavery.Malcolm Heath - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (3):243-270.
John Dewey and Daoist thought.James Behuniak - 2019 - Albany: SUNY Press, State University of New York.
Making sense of nature conservation after the end of nature.Elena Casetta - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (2):1-23.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references