From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court’s COVID-Free Exercise Cases

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):564-579 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyzes the Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” Free Exercise cases relating to COVID-19. The paper highlights the decline of deference, the impact of exemptions, and the implications of the new doctrine for vaccine and other public health laws.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Negative Freedom in Crisis Times.Leslie Francis - 2021 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 107 (1):79-89.
COVID-19 vaccine refusal as unfair free-riding.Joshua Kelsall - 2024 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (1):1-13.
Rusty Pipes: The Rust Decision and the Supreme Court's Free Flow Theory of the First Amendment.Phillip Cooper - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 6 (2):359-392.
Can One Both Contribute to and Benefit from Herd Immunity?Lucie White - 2021 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 14 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
16 (#1,196,523)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references