Dialogue and Persuasion

Dialogue and Universalism 20 (9-10):113-129 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article is an analysis of the different types of rationality forming the basis of “rational dialogue”. It presents the positions of Plato and the sophists as well as modern attempts to revive this tradition. The Platonic model (ideal) of philosophy as that which is objectively confronted with the strategies of a rational debate taking place within conditions of uncertainty (probable knowledge) and risk.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialogue and Universalism Editor’s Note.Małgorzata Czarnocka - 2018 - Dialogue and Universalism 28 (3):5-5.
Dialectic as Ethical Askēsis in Plato and Aristotle.Ronald A. Waite - 1998 - Dialogue and Universalism 8 (11):33-41.
The Place of Responsibility in the Philosophy of Law.Frederic R. Kellogg - 1995 - Dialogue and Universalism 5 (11):119-123.
Universal Dialogue.Albert A. Anderson - 1998 - Dialogue and Universalism 8 (10):9-17.
Space and Modern Society.Leszek Kuźnicki - 1995 - Dialogue and Universalism 5 (8):5-16.
The Wanderings of Ideas or a Model of Humanity?Aleksander Lewin - 1997 - Dialogue and Universalism 7 (9):11-24.
Dialogue on Personal Identity.John D. Sommer - 1998 - Dialogue and Universalism 8 (11):103-108.
What a tragedy modern life is.Janusz Korczak - 1997 - Dialogue and Universalism 7 (9):203-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
32 (#707,106)

6 months
4 (#1,249,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references