- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ten reasons to embrace scientism
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63:11-21 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and Rene van Woudenberg, eds., "Scientism: Prospects and Problems.".Glenn Branch - 2020 - Philosophy in Review 40 (3):107-109.
Science, scientism, and never-ending myths about the scientistic stance: Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels and René van Woudenberg (Eds.): Scientism: prospects and problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 320pp, $58.43 HB. [REVIEW]Serdal Tümkaya - 2021 - Metascience 30 (2):323-326.
Scientism: Prospects and Problems ed. by Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg.Edward Feser - 2019 - Review of Metaphysics 73 (2):363-364.
Perspectives on Ignorance from Moral and Social Philosophy, edited by Rik Peels.Pierre Le Morvan - 2019 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (4):536-539.
Rik Peels’ Ignorance: A Philosophical Study.Daniel R. DeNicola - 2023 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 13 (3):239-254.
The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance Edited by Rik Peels and Martijn Blaauw Cambridge University Press, 2016. 217pp, $99.99 ISBN: 9780511820076. [REVIEW]Charlie Crerar - 2019 - Philosophy 94 (1):161-166.
Rik Peels and René van Woudenberg, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Common-Sense Philosophy.Hans Van Eyghen - 2022 - Philosophia Reformata 87 (1):75-78.
Ten reasons why a thermalized system cannot be described by a many-particle wave function.Barbara Drossel - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 58 (C):12-21.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-06-20
Downloads
91 (#231,987)
6 months
14 (#236,708)
2017-06-20
Downloads
91 (#231,987)
6 months
14 (#236,708)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How Not to Criticise Scientism.Johan Hietanen, Petri Turunen, Ilmari Hirvonen, Janne Karisto, Ilkka Pättiniemi & Henrik Saarinen - 2020 - Metaphilosophy 51 (4):522-547.
In Defense of Weak Scientism: A Reply to Brown.Moti Mizrahi - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (2):9-22.
More in Defense of Weak Scientism.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (4):7-25.
Normativity between Naturalism and Phenomenology.Thomas J. Spiegel - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (5):493-518.
References found in this work
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (3):231-59.
A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.
Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism.William J. FitzPatrick - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):883-904.
The mind’s best trick: How we experience conscious will.Daniel M. Wegner - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2):65-69.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2