A critique of the deconstructionist account of gender equity and education.. Four responses to Davies: Pieteg, Houston, Leach, and Walker

Educational Philosophy and Theory 21 (1):20–24 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1469-5812.1989.tb00116.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A critique of the deconstructionist account of gender equity and education.Jeanne Pietig - 1989 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 21 (1):20-24.
Dismantling a deconstructionist history of philosophy of education.Kevin Harris - 1988 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 20 (1):50–62.
The First 600 Months of Philosophy of Education—1935–1985: A Deconstructionist History.James S. Kaminsky - 1986 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 18 (2):42-48.
Crossing the Boundaries: Educational Thought and Gender Equity.Bronwyn Davies Mary Leach - 1990 - Educational Theory 40 (3):321-332.
James (J.C.) Walker: Philosopher of Education – The celebration of a life.Michael A. Peters & Paul Hager - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (1):11-15.
James Walker, Philosopher of Education – Five tributes from colleagues.Michael Matthews, Robert Mackie, Colin Evers, Steve Crump & Paul Hager - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (1):5-10.
A. F. Leach as a Historian of Yorkshire Education.W. E. Tate - 1963 - British Journal of Educational Studies 12 (1):83-85.
Education without theory.Wilfred Carr - 2006 - British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (2):136-159.
Education for sexism: A theoretical analysis of the sex/gender bias in education.Bronwyn Davies - 1989 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 21 (1):1–19.
Bildung and the historical and genealogical critique of contemporary culture: Wilhelm von Humboldt’s neo-humanistic theory of Bildung and Nietzsche’s critique of neo-humanistic ideas in classical philology and education.Tomislav Zelić - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (6-7):662-671.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#568,851)

6 months
16 (#178,571)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references