- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science [Book Review]
Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523 (2000)
Abstract
This paper elaborates on the Golem metaphor as a way of understanding uncertainty in science. Its implications for the ethics of communicating science are exploredOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science.Trevor Pinch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523.
Talking about science: Commentary on “The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science”.Sheila Jasanoff - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):525-528.
The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science. Harry Collins, Trevor Pinch. [REVIEW]David L. Hull - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (3):487-488.
The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science by Harry Collins; Trevor Pinch. [REVIEW]Ben Marsden - 1995 - Isis 86:357-358.
Review of Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch: The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):261-266.
Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. xii + 164. ISBN 0-521-35601-6. £10.95, $19.95. [REVIEW]Jan Golinski - 1994 - British Journal for the History of Science 27 (4):487-488.
Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, Dr. Golem: How to Think about Medicine. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Pp. 280. ISBN 0-226-11366-3. $25.00, £17.50. [REVIEW]Neil Pemberton - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Science 40 (3):464.
Herbert's Gholas.Jennifer Mundale - 2022-10-17 - In Kevin S. Decker (ed.), Dune and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 99–107.
Creating Golems: Uses of Golem Stories in the Ethics of Technologies.Erik Thorstensen - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (2):153-168.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
35 (#648,941)
6 months
6 (#869,904)
2013-12-01
Downloads
35 (#648,941)
6 months
6 (#869,904)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Uncertainties of Nutrigenomics and Their Ethical Meaning.Michiel Korthals & Rixt Komduur - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):435-454.
Talking about science: Commentary on “The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science”.Sheila Jasanoff - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):525-528.
Ethical issues in communicating science.Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
Ethical issues in communicating science.Professor Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life.Steven Shapin & Simon Schaffer - 1985 - Princeton University Press.
Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice.Harry Collins - 1985 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2