Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):722-722 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jep.12017

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool.Reema Sirriyeh, Rebecca Lawton, Peter Gardner & Gerry Armitage - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):746-752.
Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research.Rocco Cavaleri, Sameer Bhole & Amit Arora - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 1027-1049.
Appraising the quality of mixed methods research in nursing: A qualitative case study of nurse researchers’ views.Sergi Fàbregues & Marie-Hélène Paré - 2018 - Nursing Inquiry 25 (4):e12247.
Outcomes of clinical ethics support near the end of life: A systematic review.Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stephan Nadolny, Marjolein Gysels, Claudia Bausewein, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2020 - Nursing Ethics 27 (3):838-854.
Are the outcomes of clinical pathways evidence‐based? A critical appraisal of clinical pathway evaluation research.Noha El Baz, Berrie Middel, Jitse P. van Dijk, Andre Oosterhof, Piet W. Boonstra & Sijmen A. Reijneveld - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (6):920-929.
Challenging procedures used in systematic reviews by promoting a case‐based approach to the analysis of qualitative methods in nursing trials.Elizabeth G. Creamer, Timothy C. Guetterman, Ishtar Govia & Michael D. Fetters - 2021 - Nursing Inquiry 28 (2):e12393.
Developing mixed methods research in sport and exercise psychology : potential contributions of a critical realist perspective.Tatiana V. Ryba, Gareth Wiltshire, Julian North & Noora J. Ronkainen - forthcoming - International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 20 (1).
Making a difference: towards a method for weighing the evidence in a qualitative synthesis.Hennie R. Boeije, Floryt van Wesel & Eva Alisic - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):657-663.
How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers.Joanna E. M. Sale - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):912-913.
Смешанная методология социальных наук.Александра Александровна Аргамакова - 2023 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 60 (4):212-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
60 (#345,189)

6 months
6 (#809,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pierre Pluye
McGill University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references