Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool

, , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):746-752 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01662.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Towards quality Pacific services: the development of a service self‐evaluation tool for Pacific addiction services in New Zealand.Kathleen S. Samu, Amanda Wheeler, Lanuola Asiasiga, Synthia M. Dash, Gail Robinson, Lucy Dunbar & Tamasailau Suaalii-Sauni - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1036-1044.
Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews.Pierre Pluye - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):722-722.
Organizational assessment in general practice: a systematic review and implications for quality improvement.Melody Rhydderch, Adrian Edwards, Glyn Elwyn, Martin Marshall, Yvonne Engels, Pieter Van den Hombergh & Richard Grol - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (4):366-378.
Prioritizing guideline topics: development and evaluation of a practical tool.Eeva Ketola, Erja Toropainen, Minna Kaila, Riitta Luoto & Marjukka Mäkelä - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):627-631.
The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment.J. Hu, R. Chen, S. Wu, J. Tang, G. Leng, I. Kunnamo, Z. Yang, W. Wang, X. Hua, Y. Zhang, Y. Xie & S. Zhan - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):961-967.
Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision (LEGEND): an evidence evaluation system for point‐of‐care clinicians and guideline development teams.Eloise Clark, Karen Burkett & Danette Stanko-Lopp - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1054-1060.
Reasons for non‐use of proven pharmacotherapeutic interventions: systematic review and framework development.Arden R. Barry, Peter S. Loewen, Jane de Lemos & Karen G. Lee - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):49-55.
The language of quality.Michael Loughlin - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (2):87-95.
Optimizing the design of visual analogue scales for assessing quality of life: a semi‐qualitative study among Chinese‐speaking Singaporeans.Hwee-Lin Wee, Kok-Yong Fong, Connie Tse, David Machin, Yin-Bun Cheung, Nan Luo & Julian Thumboo - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (1):121-125.
Assessing the quality of colorectal cancer care: do we have appropriate quality measures? (A systematic review of literature).Meenal Patwardhan, Deborah A. Fisher, Christopher R. Mantyh, Douglas C. McCrory, Michael A. Morse, Robert G. Prosnitz, Kathryn Cline & Gregory P. Samsa - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (6):831-845.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
47 (#467,552)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references