Causal probability

Synthese 132 (1-2):143 - 185 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Examples growing out of the Newcomb problem have convinced many people that decision theory should proceed in terms of some kind of causal probability. I endorse this view and define and investigate a variety of causal probability. My definition is related to Skyrms' definition, but proceeds in terms of objective probabilities rather than subjective probabilities and avoids taking causal dependence as a primitive concept.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
126 (#171,803)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Pollock
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Transformative Decision Rules.Peterson Martin - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (1):71-85.
Plans And Decisions.John L. Pollock - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (2):79-107.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice.Robert Nozick - 1970 - In Carl G. Hempel, Donald Davidson & Nicholas Rescher (eds.), Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht,: D. Reidel. pp. 114–46.
Pragmatics and Empiricism.Brian Skyrms - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):514-516.
Direct inference.Isaac Levi - 1977 - Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):5-29.
Causal decision theory.Brian Skyrms - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (11):695-711.

View all 9 references / Add more references