Discussion the importance of continuity: A reply to Chris Eliasmith

Minds and Machines 12 (3):435-435 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of continuity of dynamic representations serves as a beacon for an integrative neuroscience to emerge.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1016127125203

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Discreteness and relevance: A reply to Roman poznanski. [REVIEW]Chris Eliasmith - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (3):437-438.
Reply to Glymour and Thayse.Selmer Bringsjord & David A. Ferrucci - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):313-315.
Reply to Bringsjord and Ferrucci.André Thayse - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):311-312.
Mind, Matter, and Supervenience: A Reply to Mulhauser.Philip P. Hanson - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):293-300.
Mind, Matter, and Supervenience: A Reply to Mulhauser. [REVIEW]Philip P. Hanson - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):293-300.
Timothy R. Colburn, philosophy and computer science.Bipin Indurkhya - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (3):454-459.
Bureaucracy and heartlessness: Reply to Dahlbom. [REVIEW]Matthew Elton - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):419-421.
An end to the controversy? A reply to Rips.Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):425-432.
The syntax of Galileo: Reply to Ray Jackendoff. [REVIEW]James H. Bunn - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):137-147.
Discussion review.Robert L. Causey - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (3):345-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
93 (#226,124)

6 months
19 (#153,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references