The ethical significance of illeity (emmanuel lévinas)

Heythrop Journal 37 (2):125–138 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From inception to extinction, objective criteria regarding the defining characteristics of "personhood" are sought to justify responsibility. But, when we relate to others, what do we actually relate to? In The Ethical Significance of Illeity, L vinas's concept of illeity is used to argue that the responsibility owed to others flows not from an ability to comprehend the defining characteristics of "personhood" but from the fact that persons are ultimately "neutral" and beyond disclosure. Ethics should not be dominated by knowledge; rather, the ethical relationship with the other should guide the progress of understanding. Philosophy is the wisdom of love at the service of love

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#244,751)

6 months
12 (#304,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Corporate Legal Responsibility: A Levinasian Perspective.Conceição Soares - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):545-553.
Derechos humanos como derechos Del otro en lévinas.Edgar Antonio López - 2010 - Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana 31 (103).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references