Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse: Inquisitorial and Adversarial Procedures of Witness Examination in Criminal Trials

[author unknown]
(2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book review: Grażyna Anna Bednarek, Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse: Inquisitorial and Adversarial Procedures of Witness Examination in Criminal Trials. [REVIEW]Hanna H. Wei - 2016 - Discourse Studies 18 (3):362-364.
Book review: Grażyna Anna Bednarek, Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse: Inquisitorial and Adversarial Procedures of Witness Examination in Criminal Trials. [REVIEW]Wen Ma - 2016 - Discourse and Communication 10 (3):316-318.
Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The Case of Public Inquiries. [REVIEW]Silvia Cavalieri - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):209-221.
“Is it the case that …?”: Building toward findings of fact in Japanese criminal trials.Ikuko Nakane - 2017 - Semiotica 2017 (216):423-450.
A Different Class of Witnesses: Experts in the Courtroom.Gail Stygall - 2001 - Discourse Studies 3 (3):327-349.
Human Rights vs. Political Reality: The Case of Europe’s Harmonising Criminal Justice Systems.Theo Gavrielides - 2005 - International Journal of Comparative Criminology 5 (1):60-84.
Courtroom setups in China's criminal trials.Ying-Long Zheng - 2014 - Semiotica 2014 (201):299-322.
How Many Interpreters Does It Take to Interpret the Testimony of an Expert Witness? A Case Study of Interpreter-Mediated Expert Witness Examination.Jieun Lee - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (1):189-208.
Is courtroom discourse an ‘oral’ or ‘literate’ register? The importance of sub-register.Meishan Chen - 2021 - Discourse Studies 23 (3):249-273.
Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials.Sandra Harris - 2001 - Discourse Studies 3 (1):53-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the Need to Study Processes of Taking Minutes from Case Hearings: Contribution to and Call for Future Research.Michał Dudek & Mateusz Stępień - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (2):421-446.
How Do Non-professional Participants of a Trial Cope with the Communication Process at the Trial? The Results of Empirical Research Conducted in Polish Courts.Karolina Gmerek - 2023 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 36 (2):791-813.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references