How to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Redefining cognitive psychology.John Jonides & Patricia Reuter-Lorenz - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):363-364.
G. F. Parrot and the theory of unconscious inferences.Jüri Allik & Kenn Konstabel - 2005 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (4):317-330.
Ethics.Mark L. Johnson - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 691–701.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
49 (#468,991)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katinka Quintelier
University of Ghent

References found in this work

Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 13 (3):7-9.
Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.
Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
A Treatise of Human Nature: 2 Volume Set.David Hume - 2007 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 21 references / Add more references