Saving Faith from Kant’s Remarkable Antimony

Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):418-433 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a critical study of Kant’s antinomy of saving faith. In the first section, I sketch aspects of Kant’s philosophical account of sin and atonement that help explain why he finds saving faith problematic from the moral point of view. I proceed in the next section to give a detailed exposition of Kant’s remarkable antinomy and of his proposal for resolving it theoretically. In the third and final section, I argue that alternative ways of resolving the antimony both respond to the deepest of Kant’s moral concerns and comport better with the traditional Christian conviction that saving faith can have for its object the historical individual Jesus Christ.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification.Philip L. Quinn - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (4):440-462.
Grace and Controlling What We Do Not Cause.Kevin Timpe - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):284-299.
Kant, Augustine, and Room for Faith.Edgar Valdez - 2013 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 18 (1):19-35.
Kant, Augustine, and Room for Faith.Edgar Valdez - 2013 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 18 (1):19-35.
Kant and the question of meaning.Garrath Williams - 1999 - Philosophical Forum 30 (2):115–131.
Kant’s Two Touchstones for Conviction.Joseph S. Trullinger - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 67 (2):369-403.
Science and Faith in Kant's First Critique.Everett C. Fulmer - 2012 - Dissertation, Georgia State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
86 (#243,672)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?