- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Must a metaphysical relativist be a truth relativist?
Philosophia 22 (1-2):75-85 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Relativism and truth: A reply to Steven Rappaport.Michael P. Lynch - 1997 - Philosophia 25 (1-4):417-421.
Relativism and truth: A reply to davson-Galle.Steven Rappaport - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):519-524.
A Relativist Theory of Truth and the Problem of Skepticism.Roger Alan Fleming - 1979 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Must a Historicist be a Relativist?Patrick Murray - 1989 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1989 (80):182-192.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
129 (#171,246)
6 months
19 (#158,749)
2009-01-28
Downloads
129 (#171,246)
6 months
19 (#158,749)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Metaphysical relativism and the disquotational view of reference.Bradley Armour-Garb - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (1-2):225-239.
References found in this work
Seven Strictures on Similarity.Nelson Goodman - 1972 - In Problems and projects. Indianapolis,: Bobbs-Merrill.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2