Dedekind's structuralism: An interpretation and partial defense

Synthese 137 (3):369 - 419 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Various contributors to recent philosophy of mathematics havetaken Richard Dedekind to be the founder of structuralismin mathematics. In this paper I examine whether Dedekind did, in fact, hold structuralist views and, insofar as that is the case, how they relate to the main contemporary variants. In addition, I argue that his writings contain philosophical insights that are worth reexamining and reviving. The discussion focusses on Dedekind''s classic essay Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?, supplemented by evidence from Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen, his scientific correspondence, and his Nachlaß.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Tait on Kant and Finitism.W. Sieg - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (5/6):274-285.
Dedekind on continuity.Emmylou Haffner & Dirk Schlimm - 2020 - In Stewart Shapiro & Geoffrey Hellman (eds.), The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 255–282.
Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?Hans Rohrbach - 1966 - Mainz,: Johannes Gutenberg-Buchhandlung Kohl.
Infinity and the Self: Royce on Dedekind.Sébastien Gandon - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):354-382.
Frege, Dedekind, and the Origins of Logicism.Erich H. Reck - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):242-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
146 (#154,419)

6 months
10 (#399,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erich Reck
University of California, Riverside