“Special Treatment”: BiDil, Tuskegee, and the Logic of Race

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):478-484 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The presence of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study was palpable at the June 16, 2005, Food and Drug Administration’s Advisory Committee meeting on BiDil, a heart medication from the pharmaceutical company NitroMed that sought approval as the first race-specific drug. So ubiquitous is the restless and unsettled spirit of Tuskegee that it continues to hover over the African American public and the biomedical research/health care provider communities more than three and a half decades after the actual study “died.” No one invoked the word “Tuskegee” in that dimly lit meeting room as BiDil gained the Advisory Committee’s approval. Yet its power was exerted even when it was not named. The FDA Committee’s chairman, Cleveland Clinic cardiology chief Steven Nissen, acknowledged this after the committee met: “We were putting [Tuskegee]…to rest.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Special Treatment”: BiDil, Tuskegee, and the Logic of Race.Susan M. Reverby - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):478-484.
Race, Pharmacogenomics, and Marketing: Putting BiDil in Context.Jonathan Kahn - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):W1-W5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
56 (#372,396)

6 months
11 (#312,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research.Steven Epstein - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):174-178.

Add more references