Contractualism and the new and improved redundancy objection

Analysis 63 (4):337-342 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/63.4.337

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Contractualism and the new and improved redundancy objection.Michael Ridge - 2003 - Analysis 63 (4):337–342.
Scanlon's contractualism and the redundancy objection.Philip Stratton&Ndashlake - 2003 - Analysis 63 (1):70-76.
Scanlon's contractualism and the redundancy objection.Philip Stratton-Lake - 2003 - Analysis 63 (277):70-76.
Contractualist Replies to the Redundancy Objections.Jussi Suikkanen - 2005 - Theoria 71 (1):38-58.
Particularism Doesn’t Flatten.Amelia Hicks - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (3):339-362.
Scanlon, permissions, and redundancy: response to McNaughton and Rawling.Michael Ridge - unknown
Scanlon's Contractualism, the Spare Wheel Objection, and Aggregation'.Brad Hooker - 2003 - In Matt Matravers (ed.), Scanlon and contractualism. Portland, Or.: Frank Cass.
Wrong-Making Reasons.Kieran Setiya - 1998 - In Martina Herrmann (ed.), Reading Parfit. Springer Netherlands. pp. 123-134.
Finagling Frege.Mark Schroeder - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
146 (#155,173)

6 months
18 (#164,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Ridge
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Contractualism.Elizabeth Ashford - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Contractualism and the Significance of Perspective-Taking.Peter Timmerman - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):909-925.
The redundancy objection, and why Scanlon is not a contractualist.Tamra Frei - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1):47-65.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
The View from Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Behaviorism 15 (1):73-82.
The View from Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (2):280-281.

View all 11 references / Add more references