- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Goals for a theory of deduction: Reply to Johnson-Laird [Book Review]
Minds and Machines 7 (3):409-424 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
An end to the controversy? A reply to Rips.Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):425-432.
Reply to Glymour and Thayse.Selmer Bringsjord & David A. Ferrucci - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):313-315.
Mind, Matter, and Supervenience: A Reply to Mulhauser.Philip P. Hanson - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):293-300.
Mind, Matter, and Supervenience: A Reply to Mulhauser. [REVIEW]Philip P. Hanson - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):293-300.
Bureaucracy and heartlessness: Reply to Dahlbom. [REVIEW]Matthew Elton - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):419-421.
The heart of Dennett's philosophy: Reply to Elton. [REVIEW]Bo Dahlbom - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):415-418.
Models rule, OK? A reply to Fetzer.P. N. Johnson-Laird & Ruth M. J. Byrne - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (1):111-118.
The syntax of Galileo: Reply to Ray Jackendoff. [REVIEW]James H. Bunn - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):137-147.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
69 (#307,126)
6 months
10 (#423,770)
2009-01-28
Downloads
69 (#307,126)
6 months
10 (#423,770)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Models rule, OK? A reply to Fetzer.P. N. Johnson-Laird & Ruth M. J. Byrne - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (1):111-118.
An end to the controversy? A reply to Rips.Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):425-432.
Illusions of consistency in quantified assertions.Niklas Kunze, Sangeet Khemlani, Max Lotstein & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
David W. green and others, cognitive science: An introduction. [REVIEW]Christopher D. Green - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (3):437-443.
References found in this work
Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery.John H. Holland, Keith J. Holyoak, Richard E. Nisbett & Paul R. Thagard - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):269-272.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2