Commentary

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):539-539 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The patient in this case does not have enough small bowel to be compatible with life. Given this prognosis the decisions to establish a DNR status and discontinue TPN are both appropriate. However, by not attempting an earlier extubation or withdrawing the hydration as well as the TPN, the attending physician set the stage for the ensuing disaster

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary.Gerrit Kimsma - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (4):454-455.
Commentary.Andrew Thurman - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):129-130.
Commentary.David Lowenthal - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):423-425.
Commentary.Ben A. Rich - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):100-104.
Commentary.Howard Klepper - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):213-214.
Commentary.Rosamond Rhodes - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):378-380.
Commentary.Patrick McCruden - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):130-131.
Commentary.Robert S. Olick - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):428-430.
Commentary.Joel Frader - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):376-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
25 (#877,287)

6 months
18 (#160,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references