Thinking And Machines

Philosophy 33 (126):356-356 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professors A. D. Ritchie and F. H. George both miss the question: What is the use of saying that machines think? Does the extension in the use of the word “think” to cover the complicated activity of modern machines enable us to explain better the nature of such activity? Extensions in usage are common and necessary in science

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking and Machines.A. D. Ritchie & W. Mays - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (122):258 - 261.
Thinking and Machines.F. H. George - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (121):168 - 169.
Can machines think?W. Mays - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (April):148-62.
Davidson's no-priority thesis in defending the Turing Test.Mohammad Reza Vaez Shahrestani - 2012 - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32:456-461.
Machines as Persons?Oswald Hanfling - 1991 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 29:25-34.
Machines: to Have or to Be?Sabine Haupt - 2023 - Journal of Ethics in Higher Education 2:111-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
32 (#741,023)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references