Different standards are not double standards: all elective surgical patients are not alike

Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (2):118-128 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Testa and colleagues argue that evaluation for suitability for living donor surgery is rooted in paternalism in contrast with the evaluation for most operative interventions, which is rooted in the autonomy of patients. We examine two key ethical concepts that Testa and colleagues use: paternalism a …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paternalism and partial autonomy.Onora O' Neill - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):173-178.
Paternalism and partial autonomy.O. O'Neill - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):173-178.
“Clinical” Surgical Ethics.Peter Angelos - 2019 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 30 (1):49-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
14 (#1,321,670)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references