First-order logic, second-order logic, and completeness

In Vincent F. Hendricks (ed.), First-order logic revisited. Berlin: Logos. pp. 303-321 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates the claim that the second-order consequence relation is intractable because of the incompleteness result for SOL. The opponents’ claim is that SOL cannot be proper logic since it does not have a complete deductive system. I argue that the lack of a completeness theorem, despite being an interesting result, cannot be held against the status of SOL as a proper logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Svojstva klasične logike [Properties of Classical Logic].Srećko Kovač - 2013 - Zagreb: Hrvatski studiji Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Infinity, Choice, and Hume’s Principle.Stephen Mackereth - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (5):1413-1439.
Infinity, Choice, and Hume’s Principle.Stephen Mackereth - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (5):1413-1439.
Basics of Second-Order Predicate Logic.Nijaz Ibrulj - 2023 - The Logical Foresight 3 (1):1-14.
Completeness and categoricity: Frege, gödel and model theory.Stephen Read - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (2):79-93.
Frege's Begriffsschrift is Indeed First-Order Complete.Yang Liu - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (4):342-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#238,057)

6 months
87 (#68,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Rossberg
University of Connecticut

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references