- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision
State University of New York Press (1991)
Abstract
Unites George Herbert Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in a shared rejection of substance philosophy as well as spectator theory of knowledge, in favor of a focus on the ultimacy of temporal process and the constitutive function of social praxisAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision.Sandra B. Rosenthal - 1991 - In . State University of New York Press.
Sandra B. Rosenthal and Patrick L. Bourgeois, Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision Reviewed by.Glenn W. Erickson - 1992 - Philosophy in Review 12 (5):351-353.
Sandra B. Rosenthal and Patrick L. Bourgeois, "Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision". [REVIEW]Mitchell Aboulafia - 1992 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (4):868.
Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision. By Sandra B. Rosenthal and Patrick L. Bourgeois. [REVIEW]Timothy Wickenhauser - 1993 - Modern Schoolman 70 (2):155-156.
Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision, ed. by Sandra Rosenthal and Patrick Bourgeois. [REVIEW]Eduardo Mendietta - 1993 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 16 (1):281-283.
Role taking, corporeal intersubjectivity, and self: Mead and Merleau-Ponty.R. L. Rosenthal Bourgeois S. B. - 1990 - Philosophy Today 34 (2).
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-06
Downloads
36 (#625,374)
6 months
5 (#1,035,700)
2014-02-06
Downloads
36 (#625,374)
6 months
5 (#1,035,700)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Imagery in action. G. H. Mead’s contribution to sensorimotor enactivism.Guido Baggio - 2021 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (5):935-955.
Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto.Shaun Gallagher - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (3):839-851.
Following his own path: Li Zehou and contemporary Chinese philosophy.Jana Rošker - 2019 - Albany: SUNY Press.
Empathy as intersubjectivity: resolving Hume and Smith’s divide.Matthew Victor Schertz - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (2):165-178.
Harré and Merleau-ponty: Beyond the absent moving body in embodied social theory.Charles R. Varela - 1994 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (2):167–185.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2