Say What? A Game-Theoretic Approach to the Said/Implicated Distinction

In Ken Turner (ed.), Making Semantics Pragmatic. Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 24--205 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The myth of conventional implicature.Kent Bach - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):327-366.
What is said and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.François Recanati - 2004 - In Claudia Bianchi (ed.), the semantics/pragmatics distinction. CSLI. pp. 45-64.
The Metaphysics and the Epistemology of Meaning.Jonas Pfister - 2007 - De Gruyter.
On Communicative Intention And Saying/implicating Distinction.Ivana Stojanovic-Prelevic - 2011 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 9 (2):107-114.
What is said.Patrick Hawley - 2002 - Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8):969-991.
A Model Theoretic Semantics for Quantum Logic.E. -W. Stachow - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:272 - 280.
Semantics and Pragmatics in the Interpretation of Metaphor.Catherine Wearing - 2002 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Game Theory and Lingustic Meaning.Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (ed.) - 2007 - BRILL.
Three demonstrations and a funeral.Kepa Korta & John Perry - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):166–186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
8 (#1,582,940)

6 months
2 (#1,688,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references