- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Bad arguments about Darwinism
Think 3 (8):41-46 (2004)
Abstract
In Think 7, philosopher Jenny Teichman accused the geneticist Professor Stephen Jones and other contemporary Darwinists of confusion and of overestimating Darwinism's explanatory power. Here, Micheal Ruse explains why he believes it is actually Teichman who is confusedAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Jenny Teichman, Polemical Papers Reviewed by.Alex Boston - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19 (5):383-385.
Jenny Teichman, Philosophy and the Mind. [REVIEW]Karl Pfeifer - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (8):332-333.
Jenny Teichman, The Philosophy of War and Peace. [REVIEW]Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (3):228-230.
Teichman, Jenny, "Illegitimacy: An Examination of Bastardy". [REVIEW]Vinit Haksar - 1982 - Ethics 93:821.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-23
Downloads
48 (#457,686)
6 months
9 (#482,469)
2013-12-23
Downloads
48 (#457,686)
6 months
9 (#482,469)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2