Kantian Self-Conceit and the Two Guises of Authority

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):268-283 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a debate in the literature as to whether Kantian self-conceit is intrapsychic or interpersonal. I argue that self-conceit is both. I argue that, for Kant, self-conceit is fundamentally an illusion about authority, one’s own and any authority one stands in relation to. Self-conceit refuses to recognize the authority of the law. But the law “shows up” for us in two guises: one’s own reason and other persons. Thus, self-conceit refuses to recognize both guises of the law. Hence self-conceit is essentially double-sided, at once intrapsychic and interpersonal.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-25

Downloads
331 (#84,219)

6 months
146 (#31,529)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francey Russell
Barnard College

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781 - Mineola, New York: Macmillan Company. Edited by J. M. D. Meiklejohn.
Two kinds of respect.Stephen Darwall - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):36-49.

View all 28 references / Add more references