Be Non—Factive?

In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking about reasons: themes from the philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 29 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Action Explanations Ever Be Non-Factive?Constantine Sandis - 2013 - In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking about reasons: themes from the philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 29.
Non-Factive Kolmogorov Conditionalization.Michael Rescorla - forthcoming - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-46.
Can Knowledge Really be Non-factive?Michael J. Shaffer - 2021 - Logos and Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology 12 (2):215-226.
The non-factive turn in epistemology: some hypotheses.John Turri - 2017 - In Veli Mitova (ed.), The Factive Turn in Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 219-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
71 (#297,505)

6 months
2 (#1,690,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Constantine Sandis
University of Hertfordshire

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references