Difficulties in the theory of personal probability

Philosophy of Science 34 (4):305-310 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We statisticians, with our specific concern for uncertainty, are even more liable than other practical men to encounter philosophy, whether we like it or not. For my part, I like it comparatively well. That is why the honor of opening this session of discussion has come to me, though my background makes my knowledge and idiom somewhat different from your own.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Philosophy Transcendental?William H. Bossart - 1971 - The Monist 55 (2):293-311.
Is It Okay to Let My Child Be Stung by a Wasp?Fiona Woollard - 2019 - The Philosophers' Magazine 86:51-57.
Reply to Bratman and Smith.Kieran Setiya - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):531-540.
Normative Science?T. L. Short - 2012 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (3):310-334.
Guilt, Ethics and Religion.Paul Ricoeur - 1968 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 2:100-117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
100 (#211,908)

6 months
11 (#352,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Implications of personal probability for induction.Leonard J. Savage - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (19):593-607.

Add more references