Having Meaning

In The things we mean. New York: Oxford University Press (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To have meaning is to stand in the meaning relation to a meaning, meanings taken to be characters*. This chapter is about the nature of the meaning relation. A theory of this relation requires saying what relation a person must bear to a language in order for that language to be her public language, and also what relation a person must bear to a language in order for that language to be her language of thought. The answers bear on questions about compositional semantics and about the supervenience of the intentional on the non-intentional.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking in L.Greg Ray - 1995 - Noûs 29 (3):378-396.
What is a concept, that a person may grasp it?Ray Jackendoff - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (1-2):68-102.
The things we mean.Stephen Schiffer - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What thought requires.Donald Davidson - 2001 - In João Branquinho (ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 121.
Word Meaning.Barbara C. Malt - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 331–337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
8 (#1,576,259)

6 months
6 (#846,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Schiffer
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references