- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Managing Patient Expectations About Deidentification
American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):21-23 (2010)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Guiding Deidentification Forward.Melissa M. Goldstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):27-28.
Why Deidentification Fails Research Subjects and Researchers.Robert Gellman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):28-30.
Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):3-11.
Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):W1-W2.
Be clear about managed care to get clear about doctor-patient relations.Donald W. Light - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):35 – 36.
Managing nonfinancial conflict of interest: How the “new McCarthyism” could work.Alexander C. Tsai - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):42 - 44.
Family Medicine, The Physician–Patient Relationship, and Patient-Centered Care.Howard Brody - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):38 – 39.
Patient Compliance; Wherefore Art Thou?Marc B. Hahn - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (11):13-14.
The Patient-Centered Opioid Treatment Agreement.Seddon Savage - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (11):18-19.
Finding Meaning in the Doctor–Patient Relationship.Julie M. Aultman - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):39 – 41.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-03
Downloads
46 (#479,192)
6 months
10 (#399,629)
2010-09-03
Downloads
46 (#479,192)
6 months
10 (#399,629)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data.Oscar A. Zarate, Julia Green Brody, Phil Brown, Monica D. Ramirez-Andreotta, Laura Perovich & Jacob Matz - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 46 (1):36-45.
Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):W1-W2.
References found in this work
Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):3-11.
Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research.Sara Chandros Hull, Richard Sharp, Jeffrey Botkin, Mark Brown, Mark Hughes, Jeremy Sugarman, Debra Schwinn, Pamela Sankar, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian Clarridge & Benjamin Wilfond - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):62-70.
Research on Medical Records without Informed Consent.Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):560-566.
Electronic Health Records and Research: Privacy Versus Scientific Priorities.Sharona Hoffman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):19-20.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2