When Do Misunderstandings Matter? Evidence From Survey Interviews About Smoking

Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (2):452-484 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Schober et al. describe two studies on how survey interview respondents misunderstand interview questions. After answering a survey, participants are given standardized definitions of the questions they have just answered. Even apparently simple questions such as “Have you smoked more than 100 cigarettes?” are interpreted very differently by participants. Moreover, clarifying the meaning of the definitions with the interviewer does not always help resolve the miscommunication.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-07

Downloads
31 (#763,697)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
Brennan (1991) Grounding in communication.H. H. Clark - 1991 - In Lauren Resnick, Levine B., M. John, Stephanie Teasley & D., Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association. pp. 127--149.
Ad hoc categories.L. W. Barsalou - 1983 - Memory and Cognition 11:211-277.

View all 7 references / Add more references