The language of signs: Semiosis and the memories of the future [Book Review]

Sophia 45 (1):95-116 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the perspective of semiotics, or a science of signs, communication exceeds the usual verbal mode of expression and covers extra linguistic modes. This paper addresses a specific communicative system represented by Tarot pictures. The semiotic approach not only presents Tarot as exceeding its function as a game but also de-mystifies, in part, its occult side by virtue of the analysis of semiosis, or the action of signs in nature. Using references from the Hermetic philosophy, to Dummett, to Peirce, to Smolin, the paper asserts that, should we understand the language of signs, the memories of past and future events would be accessible to human reason.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sign, dialogue, and alterity.Augusto Ponzio - 2009 - Semiotica 2009 (173):129-154.
The Forbidden Signs.Mogens Kilstrup - 2016 - Biosemiotics 9 (3):467-483.
Umberto Eco's semiotic threshold.Winfried Nöth - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:49-60.
C. S. Peirce and Intersemiotic Translation.Joao Queiroz & Daniella Aguiar - 2015 - In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 201-215.
Semiotics, edusemiotics and the culture of education.John Deely & Inna Semetsky - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (3):207-219.
Atomistic versus holistic semiotics.Mihhail Lotman - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):513-526.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#272,896)

6 months
3 (#1,473,720)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references