On Speaking One's Mind

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that a sweeping prohibition against content‐based censorship is called for by the need to protect two distinct but related vital interests: first, our autonomy interest in making and implementing our own judgments about what is worth having or doing and, second, our social interest in living in contact with others. Because the most readily available way of overcoming our isolation is to bring the thoughts of others into either alignment or engaged opposition with our own by talking to them, every instance of censorship undermines our autonomy by preempting a choice that should properly be ours alone.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-15

Downloads
5 (#1,785,961)

6 months
5 (#815,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Sher
Rice University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The autonomy defense of free speech.Susan Brison - 1998 - Ethics 108 (2):312-339.
A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2011 - Constitutional Commentary 27 (2):283-307.
Mill and milquetoast.David K. Lewis - 1989 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (2):152 – 171.

Add more references