Objectivity, rationality, incommensurability, and more [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):359-375 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incommensurability and the rationality of the development of science.Irena Szumilewicz - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):345-350.
Relativism Refuted. Harvey Siegel. [REVIEW]David Davies - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):537-539.
Siegel on the rationality of science.Brian S. Baigrie - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):435-441.
Goldman and Siegel on the epistemic aims of education.Alessia Marabini & Luca Moretti - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (3):492-506.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#220,581)

6 months
17 (#177,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Context of discovery and context of justification.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (4):501-515.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
The Structure of scientific theories.Frederick Suppe (ed.) - 1974 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
Word and Object.Henry W. Johnstone - 1961 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (1):115-116.

View all 31 references / Add more references